Anonymous
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Log in
Request account
Rest of What I Know
Search
Editing
Blog/2024-02-26/Refinement
From Rest of What I Know
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
More
More
Page actions
Read
Edit
History
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
A while back I was thinking about the role that critics play. It's actually somewhat important, associating and spotting the subtleties in art so that it doesn't go missed by those of us who don't have all that state in our head. I actually really appreciate that. But there's a thing with things where they slowly iterate themselves into a min-maxed version of itself, its [[wikipedia:Telos|Telos]], if you will. In the case of critics, they slowly evolve into attempting art of their own through their criticism. Their works become more and more inscrutable as they seek to outdo other critics, and [[Benjamin Zephaniah|they often see things that don't exist]] in their effort to be unique. But it also happens to everything else. One time I went looking for advice on which double-edge razor to buy and did the normal thing and googled [[Reddit|"double edge razor reddit"]]. But the advice there is patently insane. You have to make shaving your entire being. Folks there will talk about buying the right horse-hair brush and the right cream to get the right kind of foam. I suppose it's cool that the Internet truly enables sub-cultures, but this is the ''telos'' of all sub-cultures: specialized equipment collection. An interesting twist on that is the fact that they also have tastes for the most obscure stuff that's fallen out of general fashion. If you've ever had a whiff of YSL Kouros, you'll know that it's not something you'd wear these days. It's ''very'' musky and ''very'' strong. One drop is said to kill a beagle at 1.3 km. But it's heavily recommended on the reddits as a "classic power-fougere". If I ever see something that is described as a power-fougere, I am going to get the hell out of there. Because of all this, I spent a long time looking for the Wirecutter of art: the middle of the road source that can explain to a middle of the road person all the subtleties of some piece. Well, I haven't had much luck with ChatGPT-4 with photos of art, but if they're named famous works, it can at least summarize and trace pathways of art history quite well. So there's that! [[Category:Blog]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Rest of What I Know are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (see
Rest of What I Know:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Wiki tools
Wiki tools
Special pages
Page tools
Page tools
User page tools
More
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Page logs