Anonymous
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Log in
Request account
Rest of What I Know
Search
Editing
Blog/2024-10-16/Watch Out For Purists
From Rest of What I Know
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
More
More
Page actions
Read
Edit
History
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
Once again, someone has found out that high-purity communities are their closest allies' enemies. [https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/10/winamp-really-whips-open-source-coders-into-frenzy-with-its-source-release/ Winamp tried to open-source their code] only to be met with a frenzy of vitriol from lunatics who barely write any code. In general, it's a pretty good idea to not try to serve those who require purity since their prime purpose is often the purity itself and not utility. [[File:Screenshot Reddit Kunal Nayyar on Ellen regarding Ulta Beauty.png|thumb|If they just had a "this section sponsored by Ulta Beauty" then no donation would have occurred and everyone would be happy]] [[File:Screenshot Tumblr Mirror - PETA offers to pay water bills for vegans.png|thumb|None of the orgs that did not offer to pay are in the top 100 worst orgs ever, though]] Attempting to work with them is suicide, and will often backfire, leading to a worse outcome than if one were to ignore their causes altogether. Here are a few examples: * The Winamp Fiasco mentioned above * [https://www.reddit.com/r/clevercomebacks/comments/1f2tna5/unconditional_donation_please/ Breast Cancer Research funding from Ulta Beauty on Ellen Degeneres's Show] * [https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/67500698 Jordan Henderson playing in Saudi Arabia after supporting LGBT causes] * [https://web.archive.org/web/20140801004030/http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2014/07/24/3464033/peta-is-the-worst/ PETA offering to pay water bills for vegans] This is, of course, what happens when people believe in [[The Copenhagen Interpretation of Ethics]] and adhere to it strictly. But some communities are more adherent than others and treat the position as a religious precept. It's best to avoid those guys entirely since the fact that you have a purportedly shared interest is overshadowed by the fact that, though they hold this viewpoint perhaps stronger than you, they have done nothing to advance it. In a sense, this is the [[wikipedia:Narcissism of small differences|narcissism of small differences]] except to separate the agentic from the non-agentic. In the absence of actual advancement of the cause, some people demonstrate adherence by representing themselves as the purest supporters of the cause. The further they are from advancing the cause, the more they must assert their piety. At the limit, the cause is entirely subsumed by representing oneself as pious. [[Category:Blog]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Rest of What I Know are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (see
Rest of What I Know:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Wiki tools
Wiki tools
Special pages
Page tools
Page tools
User page tools
More
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Page logs