Anonymous
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Log in
Request account
Rest of What I Know
Search
Editing
Blog/2026-01-03/Why I Like Joe Rogan
From Rest of What I Know
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
More
More
Page actions
Read
Edit
History
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
[[File:Screenshot - Joe Rogan on Facebook reacting to a description of the JRE.png|thumb|Amusingly accurate]] I don't listen to too many podcasts, but a few times I've put the Joe Rogan Experience on while I'm driving down to the South Bay. The most typical two complaints about Joe Rogan are that he platforms terrible people and that he doesn't challenge them on their views. I'm somewhat philosophically opposed to the idea that people with reprehensible views should have their views hidden. I think that strong and able societies are able to survive the expression and analysis of reprehensible views without collapsing. In fact, I'd say that such societies are probably strong and able ''because'' of [[wikipedia:Antifragility|the underlying property that they can encounter reprehensible views safely]]. So the platforming argument never made any sense to me. I think part of what we're doing as a species or civilization is seeking pathways to better existence through the universe of possibilities, and I think we are fortunate to have the mental capacity to not usually persist in [[wikipedia:Thought-action fusion|Thought-action fusion]], i.e. we can think of things and consider them without ever having to act on them. So it's good that people see more ideas because we're pretty good about dismissing the bad ones. I understand the motivation for the other side of things but I also can't relate to it much because I'd sometimes just like to hear someone put forth their ideas in their own words. Let them steelman their own views so I have a nice gauge for what they are saying. Too often people are not described objectively and sadly the only way to find out what they're about and what their ideas are is to listen to them. Often they are nonsense, but the listeners seem to misunderstand them and describe a different kind of nonsense. Other times they make sense but the listeners who wish to describe them misunderstand them and write meaningless stuff. First party information or as close to it as possible is the only way to get anything valuable in such an informational environment, and the Joe Rogan Experience is pretty much "you tell me what you think your ideas are". The ones I've liked the most are [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udlMSe5-zP8 John Carmack] and the various Elon Musk ones. [https://jrelibrary.com/episode-list/ jrelibrary.com is a handy website to find the guests you care about]. {{#seo:|description=This blog post explores the author's perspective on the Joe Rogan Experience podcast, discussing the merits of platforming diverse views and the importance of}} [[Category:Blog]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Rest of What I Know are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (see
Rest of What I Know:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Wiki tools
Wiki tools
Special pages
Page tools
Page tools
User page tools
More
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Page logs