Anonymous
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Log in
Request account
Rest of What I Know
Search
Editing
Time-Translation Symmetry in Fields of Study
From Rest of What I Know
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
More
More
Page actions
Read
Edit
History
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
[[wikipedia:Time-translation symmetry|Time-translation symmetry]] is what some system has when it stays similar as you move through time. As an example, we believe that the laws of Physics have this. If you went back in time centuries or millennia or longer you'd find the same fundamental constants and behaviour. You can easily come up with many other fields that have this property. Mathematics is a quick example. You can also come up with other fields that don't have this property. Literature is a straightforward example because you can't talk about how some structure is interesting in Literature except in terms of the time it's in. Fields with TTS have a huge advantage in advancement: the present snapshot of best knowledge is sufficient to describe the field. Hypotheses that failed experiments etc. are useful for you to progress but you can start with some snapshot of now and get going. Fields without TTS have a massive handicap. Every practitioner is forced to replay the learnings of the field and occupy the time when the field was in some state in order to comprehend some field object's value. This results in these fields eventually becoming History of X fields rather than X fields. To use the example of Literature, most study of literature involves also studying it in a historical sense - with the value of the literature being tied to the moment. This means most Literature programs become History of Literature programs. But the need to re-run the entire replay-log has an advancement problem. Every practitioner spends some O(n) time reading the past before they get going. In contrast, a tiny fraction of time is spent on things like the [[wikipedia:Corpuscular theory of light|Corpuscular Theory of Light]] or on [[wikipedia:Aether theories|Aether theories]]. This resulting slowdown causes these fields to stop advancing slowly. This slowness among the best practitioners causes a compression of the range between best and worst - which always causes the worst to flood something. It's therefore a very good idea to avoid fields without time-translation symmetry if you're good at things. And if you're bad at things, you should find those fields since it'll be hard for someone good to show you up. [[Category:Concepts]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Rest of What I Know are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (see
Rest of What I Know:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Wiki tools
Wiki tools
Special pages
Page tools
Page tools
User page tools
More
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Page logs