Roshan's Conjecture: Difference between revisions

From Rest of What I Know
Created page with "When I was a young child, I noticed a pattern. Every number past 3 seemed to have a pair of primes 'around' it. # <math> (4-1) < 4 < (4+1) </math> # <math> (5-2) < 5 < (5+2) </math> # <math> (6-1) < 6 < (6+1) </math> # <math> (7-4) < 7 < (7+4) </math> # <math> (11324-45) < 11324 < (11324+45) </math> Notice how for every number you can think of, there's a prime below it and a prime above it equidistant from it. Better stated, what I concluded was that: <math>\forall n..."
(No difference)

Revision as of 06:07, 16 June 2024

When I was a young child, I noticed a pattern. Every number past 3 seemed to have a pair of primes 'around' it.

  1. (41)<4<(4+1)
  2. (52)<5<(5+2)
  3. (61)<6<(6+1)
  4. (74)<7<(7+4)
  5. (1132445)<11324<(11324+45)

Notice how for every number you can think of, there's a prime below it and a prime above it equidistant from it.

Better stated, what I concluded was that:

n>3N,k1N such that nk and n+k are both prime. I couldn't find a single counter-example to this. I was terribly excited, of course, because I thought I'd discovered some fundamental property of the universe.

Of course this turns out to be almost entirely equivalent to the famous modern form of Goldbach's conjecture with a little cajoling. So much for my foray into Mathematics!