Gradients Dominate Points: Difference between revisions
From Rest of What I Know
No edit summary |
Added page description via AutoDescriptor bot |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
e.g. A question like "does our GDP need to be bigger?" is therefore implicitly asking "shouldn't our GDP be smaller?" | e.g. A question like "does our GDP need to be bigger?" is therefore implicitly asking "shouldn't our GDP be smaller?" | ||
{{#seo:|description=This page explains how gradients and imprecision inherently dominate many real-world phenomena, from companies and nations to living beings, where precise}} | |||
[[Category:Concepts]] | [[Category:Concepts]] | ||
Latest revision as of 01:35, 31 August 2025
Very few things allow precise aim, and almost all of those things are engineering problems. Things that are coordination-dominated are sloppy and imprecise and consequently, you can only apply thrust towards a target or away from the target, with little control over the minimum thrust. Hysteresis dominates, and you will always overshoot the target.
You'll see this in many places:
- Companies are either growing or shrinking - they don't stay constant
- Nations are either improving or failing - the latter especially so for those who want to stay constant
And perhaps not so obviously, also true for living beings, which are either going through continuous cell replacement or dying as cells fail to be replaced.
e.g. A question like "does our GDP need to be bigger?" is therefore implicitly asking "shouldn't our GDP be smaller?"
