Iteration Dogma: Difference between revisions

From Rest of What I Know
Created page with "The Iteration Dogma is the belief that adapting to evidence is far superior to picking the right prior. It is commonly employed in the startup-mindset of searching for Product-market fit where it is considered boringly true. == Examples == * Searching for product-market fit is the primary example. * Bayesian updating under prior-support, distinguishability of hypotheses (particularly truth from alternatives in the wikipedia:Kullb..."
 
Added page description via AutoDescriptor bot
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:


* Bayesian updating under prior-support, distinguishability of hypotheses (particularly truth from alternatives in the [[wikipedia:Kullback–Leibler divergence|KL divergence]] sense)  
* Bayesian updating under prior-support, distinguishability of hypotheses (particularly truth from alternatives in the [[wikipedia:Kullback–Leibler divergence|KL divergence]] sense)  
* [[wikipedia:Karl Popper|Popper]]-style empirical science with [[wikipedia:Critical rationalism|falsifiable conjectures formed which are iteratively refined through targeted refutation]]


== Where It Does Not Work ==
== Where It Does Not Work ==


The iteration dogma is a bad idea to employ in fields where global convergence are not possible. e.g. finding the roots of a polynomial employing [[wikipedia:Newton's method|Newton-Raphson]] will result in slow convergence if in the wrong place.
The iteration dogma is a bad idea to employ in fields where global convergence are not possible. e.g. finding the roots of a polynomial employing [[wikipedia:Newton's method|Newton-Raphson]] will result in slow convergence if in the wrong place.
{{#seo:|description=The Iteration Dogma is the belief that adapting to evidence is superior to picking the right prior.}}


[[Category:Concepts]]
[[Category:Concepts]]

Latest revision as of 23:30, 27 January 2026

The Iteration Dogma is the belief that adapting to evidence is far superior to picking the right prior. It is commonly employed in the startup-mindset of searching for Product-market fit where it is considered boringly true.

Examples[edit]

  • Searching for product-market fit is the primary example.
  • Bayesian updating under prior-support, distinguishability of hypotheses (particularly truth from alternatives in the KL divergence sense)

Where It Does Not Work[edit]

The iteration dogma is a bad idea to employ in fields where global convergence are not possible. e.g. finding the roots of a polynomial employing Newton-Raphson will result in slow convergence if in the wrong place.