Iteration Dogma

From Rest of What I Know
Revision as of 23:13, 27 January 2026 by Roshan (talk | contribs) (Created page with "The Iteration Dogma is the belief that adapting to evidence is far superior to picking the right prior. It is commonly employed in the startup-mindset of searching for Product-market fit where it is considered boringly true. == Examples == * Searching for product-market fit is the primary example. * Bayesian updating under prior-support, distinguishability of hypotheses (particularly truth from alternatives in the wikipedia:Kullb...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

The Iteration Dogma is the belief that adapting to evidence is far superior to picking the right prior. It is commonly employed in the startup-mindset of searching for Product-market fit where it is considered boringly true.

Examples

  • Searching for product-market fit is the primary example.
  • Bayesian updating under prior-support, distinguishability of hypotheses (particularly truth from alternatives in the KL divergence sense)

Where It Does Not Work

The iteration dogma is a bad idea to employ in fields where global convergence are not possible. e.g. finding the roots of a polynomial employing Newton-Raphson will result in slow convergence if in the wrong place.