The Own Goal Principle: Difference between revisions
Added page description via AutoDescriptor bot |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Tweet | |||
| name = James Medlock | |||
| username = jdcmedlock | |||
| text = People may differ on optimal protest tactics, but I think a good rule of thumb is you should behave in a manner that is clearly distinguishable from the way that paid plants from your adversaries would act in an effort to discredit you | |||
| date = Apr 29, 2024 | |||
| ID = 1784960977991278626 | |||
| ref-name = Tweet_1784960977991278626 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | {{Tweet | ||
| name = Hot Takes In Your Area | | name = Hot Takes In Your Area | ||
| Line 21: | Line 30: | ||
=== Origin === | === Origin === | ||
This particular formulation of the statement is something Twitter user seaweedanxiety disclaims having come up with but that is where I saw it first | This particular formulation of the statement is something Twitter user seaweedanxiety disclaims having come up with but that is where I saw it first. I eventually ran up against a James Medlock post<ref name=Tweet_1784960977991278626/> from before that is likely the original source. | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
{{#seo:|description=The Own Goal Principle is a useful heuristic to determine actions that advance a movement more than they harm it.}} | {{#seo:|description=The Own Goal Principle is a useful heuristic to determine actions that advance a movement more than they harm it.}} | ||
[[Category:Concepts]] | [[Category:Concepts]] | ||
Latest revision as of 08:57, 5 December 2025
James Medlock @jdcmedlock People may differ on optimal protest tactics, but I think a good rule of thumb is you should behave in a manner that is clearly distinguishable from the way that paid plants from your adversaries would act in an effort to discredit you
Apr 29, 2024[1]
Hot Takes In Your Area @seaweedanxiety I’m not the first person to express this sentiment but your actions in support of your movement should be distinguishable from the actions someone seeking to discredit your movement would engage in.
Jul 25, 2024[2]
Your actions in support of your movement should be distinguishable from the actions someone seeking to discredit your movement would engage in.
This is a useful heuristic to determine what actions will advance a movement more than they will harm it. People frequently perform radical acts of no value to a movement in an effort to supposedly "raise awareness". These acts are frequently accompanied with justification that no change in society occurred by pleasing the people currently in power. The final result of these actions is usually that the movement fails because it does not transition from activist to mainstream.
Counterpoint[edit]
Every single successful movement has had actions as part of the larger umbrella that an agent provocateur would have liked to have done, e.g. The Stonewall riots were the precursor to the modern gay pride movement.
Origin[edit]
This particular formulation of the statement is something Twitter user seaweedanxiety disclaims having come up with but that is where I saw it first. I eventually ran up against a James Medlock post[1] from before that is likely the original source.
References[edit]
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 James Medlock [@jdcmedlock] (Apr 29, 2024). "People may differ on optimal protest tactics, but I think a good rule of thumb is you should behave in a manner that is clearly distinguishable from the way that paid plants from your adversaries would act in an effort to discredit you" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
- ↑ Hot Takes In Your Area [@seaweedanxiety] (Jul 25, 2024). "I'm not the first person to express this sentiment but your actions in support of your movement should be distinguishable from the actions someone seeking to discredit your movement would engage in" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
