Anonymous
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Log in
Request account
Rest of What I Know
Search
Editing
Blog/2025-08-14/Crime Rates Are Incomplete
From Rest of What I Know
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
More
More
Page actions
Read
Edit
History
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
[[File:{{#setmainimage:Screenshot - City Homicide Simulator.png}}|thumb|alt=A screenshot from the city homicide simulator showing lots of people seeing death and destruction|A strongly opinionated visualization proves anything]] A common argument about crime rates is that big cities in the US are actually much safer than one might expect. New York's is 4.1/100k while Denver's is almost three times that at 11.9/100k<ref name=homicide-pdf/>. People often consider big cities less safe, though, and the stats wonks always find this puzzling. But the answer seems obvious to me: people consider themselves to be secondary victims of crime if they have witnessed sufficiently unpleasant things. If a man is killed in front of you, it doesn't matter that you yourself weren't killed. It only matters that a man was killed ''in front of you''. To a person witnessing a homicide, I don't think it's particularly convincing to tell them that the chance that they'll be the next person killed is 4.1/100k or whatever. You saw a person die, which is unpleasant, and you sensibly decide that this is a place where people are killed. This isn't outrageous. In fact, with guns collateral damage seems inevitable since the people wielding them are rarely good at using them. However, from experience I know that walking by a crime scene after it has been handled rarely feels like anything. You would never know. I bicycled by Twin Peaks at six in the morning, some five hours after a man was murdered there and it didn't feel like anything<ref name=after-crime/>. One thing I thought would be fun was to just take a toy model of this and see what it produces. This is fairly simplistic, but what if we said: * There are people walking around a city * They can see things within some range of them * There's a guy who will kill one person * Let's count how many see it happen * Let's count how many see the dead body * Let's assume the dead body disappears after a while And then one huge one which is that we guarantee a homicide, i.e. no matter how small the population we make sure someone's gonna die. This will force a sparse area to have a high homicide rate. {{#visualization:city-homicide|1000|1200}} Fairly simplistic, and if you're lucky the criminal will kill someone in a hidden alley, but if you run the visual a few times, varying the population you'll see that it kinda has the results we'd expect: * The higher the population, the more witnesses there are * The higher the population, the more likely someone sees the dead body * The lower the population, the higher the homicide 'rate' (because we made it so) So this rather simplistic model explains people's belief that big cities are unsafe. They are more likely to see violence and its results there than in rural areas. And that's what informs someone's opinion as to what's happening. So people are always going to claim denser areas are more unsafe than rural areas unless there is a massive difference. It just comes down to whether they saw something bad done or not. == Notes == <references> <ref name=homicide-pdf>{{cite report |url=https://www.rit.edu/liberalarts/sites/rit.edu.liberalarts/files/docs/2024-01_CPSI%20Working%20Paper_US%20City%20Homicide%20Stats.pdf |title=2024 Homicide Statistics for 24 U.S. Cities |last=Altheimer |first=Irshad |date= |publisher=[[Rochester Institute of Technology|RIT]] Center for Public Safety Initiatives |access-date=2025-08-13 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241223024437/https://www.rit.edu/liberalarts/sites/rit.edu.liberalarts/files/docs/2024-01_CPSI%20Working%20Paper_US%20City%20Homicide%20Stats.pdf |archive-date=December 23, 2024 |url-status=live }}</ref> <ref name=after-crime>And this pattern has repeated when I observe others. When [[Blog/2025-05-17/Witness For The Prosecution|I saw a man walking around with a gun in his hand threatening a woman]], I called the police, but life just went on for everyone half a block away and half an hour later. When [[Blog/2025-04-15/Catching A Laptop Thief|I helped apprehend a laptop thief]], people walked by us unconcerned both at the chase and the capture; and definitely for the hour afterwards as we had him arrested</ref> </references> {{#seo:|description=This wiki page discusses how crime rates can be incomplete in capturing the true impact of crime on a community.}} [[Category:Blog]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Rest of What I Know are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (see
Rest of What I Know:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Templates used on this page:
Template:Cite report
(
edit
)
Module:Citation/CS1
(
edit
)
Module:Citation/CS1/COinS
(
edit
)
Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration
(
edit
)
Module:Citation/CS1/Date validation
(
edit
)
Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers
(
edit
)
Module:Citation/CS1/Utilities
(
edit
)
Module:Citation/CS1/Whitelist
(
edit
)
Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css
(
edit
)
Navigation
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Wiki tools
Wiki tools
Special pages
Page tools
Page tools
User page tools
More
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Page logs